John Riley
John is a nineteen year college student in Atlanta, GA.
FACEBOOK- the NAPKIN
- FOURSQUARE
- LINKEDIN
-
FACEBOOK
- I have a private Facebook, so add me as a friend.
-
Posts
The following June, Rothko and his family again traveled to Europe. While on the SS Independence he disclosed to John Fischer, publisher of Harper’s Magazine, that his true intention for the Seagram murals was to paint “something that will ruin the appetite of every son-of-a-bitch who ever eats in that room….” He hoped, he told Fischer, that his painting would make the restaurant’s patrons “feel that they are trapped in a room where all the doors and windows are bricked up, so that all they can do is butt their heads forever against the wall.
Mark Rothko on the Seagram Murals- Thoughts on Europe
I’ve been pleasantly surprised by Paris and London. I want to offer several thoughts I’ve had as we’ve traveled these past several days.
First of all, Europe clearly embraces diversity. During two full days in Paris I heard more languages than I believe I’ve heard in fifteen years in America. I absolutely love that. One of the core reasons I switched to North Atlanta High School was diversity, which was a conscious choice to join a broken institution. I have a friend who lives in Switzerland, and she speaks four languages that she, to my knowledge, has acquired simply by living.
I think these types of encounters with diversity is crucial to being good at being human. I’ve about decided that I would be doing a disservice to my kids by having them grow up any place other than Europe, Asia, or Latin America.
Secondly, there is a strong and unifying historical/cultural context. Being “American” is something that is disputed— ask someone from Houston, Texas and someone from Austin, Texas what it means to be American and enjoy the ensuing debate. Aside from our occasional post-terrorist attack huzzah, Americans are inherently divided about our identity. Even great works of culture, like the Great Gatsby, highlight this conflict. America’s current global dominance occurred so quickly in the scope of human history, it is almost guaranteed to be temporary.
Someone who lives in Paris or London, however, is connected to an identity informed by hundreds, if not thousands, of years of history. There is a certain unity and energy that stems from this. In Paris, for example, hundreds of people lined the Seine at dinner time for a picnic, as if someone organized a flashmob on Facebook. More fundamentally, however, both cities seem more prone to longevity because of this.
Finally, the European project in and of itself is fascinating. We took the Eurostar from Paris to London- a two hour train ride under the English Channel at 180 mph. The Eurozone unifies fifteen different languages and seventeen different countries under a single currency, with one central bank, one set of protectionist policies, and free trade and travel throughout. A Berliner can work in London, vacation in Zug, and have a second home on the Amalfi Coast, all without a car.
I’m fascinated by Europe. In a way, it seems like the height of what man kind can do, in a way that is intrinsically more impressive than, say, New York. I really hope I have the opportunity to move to Europe.
- Thoughts on Inequality
As my mom and I sat down at Hartsfield Jackson on our way to Paris, I popped open the Economist and began to read an article which debated the various methods for lifting the billions of people on Earth that are in extreme poverty (which they define as living on $1.25 a day). The article states that since 1990 baseline levels, economic growth and greater equality (in some countries) have led to about half of the over two billion people living in extreme poverty to be lifted from their plight.
Several minutes later, as we board our Delta flight from Atlanta to Paris, my mom was one of six upgraded to Business Class which she generously gave to me. As my fellow Business Class passengers put their luggage away, you could see each passenger size the others up. As we took their seats, I was struck by what a blatant and physical representation of income inequality I was experiencing. While most of the passengers on this 767 are sitting in Economy (which costs over $1000 in and of itself), 17 of the 26 passengers sitting in Business Class paid over $3000 for a ticket. In a group of already incredibly wealthy Americans, these seventeen passengers are in a group of their own, a 1% amongst a 1%.
The poor middle aged male Delta flight attendant strapped on his apron and greeted each Business Class passenger by name, inquiring (with a faux-French accent) whether they would like the Sweet Potato bisque soup and which entrée they would prefer. Shortly afterwards, I noticed him pop a Dom Perignon bottle for an early forties couple, who had their twelve and ten year old daughter and son accompanying them, in the Business Class seats behind them.
While my Ayn Rand/Milton Friedman-side says this is fine, as the parents have the right to parent the way they see fit, that the consumption is good for the economy (and Delta stock), and many of these passengers saved religiously for this luxury, I’m struck by the sheer waste of resources. Imagine what those three thousand dollars could go towards.
Pure altruism aside, you could spend $3000 on many more permanent luxuries, like a TV or clothes. Instead, they have decided to spend them on a marginally more comfortable chair, which they occupy for eight hours. Hell! That $3000 could be spent on a luxurious chair for your home! Which you could have for ten years, or more!
However, as a Jesus Follower and neo-liberal political participant, this strikes me as the reification of a serious debate that has stemmed since the dawn of time, and will likely never be solved. With the fall of Soviet Union, which marked the failure of Marxism, and the promise of globalization and the “internet age”, which has also thus far failed to deal with inequality, I think that we are 10-20 years away from a major 1968-style rethinking of the global geopolitical order.
I don’t see how we can continue with the current world order, given its major failure on many fronts (America’s aching political institutions, post-WWII foreign policy, failure of global governance systems, global warming, debt, etc.) and the lack of solutions to said problems. I am, however, excited by the direction that we’re headed in several realms and think we’re on a crash course for some sort of Capitalism 2.0.
Anyways, I have no solution or conclusion. I am very thankful for the money my parents are spending on this trip, but am simply struck by the superfluous nature of this spending and pray that God will continue to work on my heart. I cannot wait to see what happens at PCC because of the That We May campaign.
Awesome birthday! My parents bought me my first piece of (good) artwork. It reminds me of Cy Twombly!
- Swissmiss' 11 Life Rules
- Invest your life in what you love
- Embrace enthusiasm
- Complaining is not an option
- Trust and empower
- Experiences trump money
- Surround yourself with like-minded people
- Collaborate
- Ignore haters
- Make time to think and breathe
- If an opportunity scares you, take it
- Be someone’s eccentric aunt
A master in the art of living draws no sharp distinction between his work and his play; his labor and his leisure; his mind and his body; his education and his recreation. He hardly know which is which. He simply pursues his vision of excellence through whatever he is doing, and leaves other to determine whether he is working or playing. To himself, he always appears to be doing both.
Education Through Recreation (1937), L.P. JackHuntsman is absolutely brilliant, and the fact that he can’t get elected is a dire sign for our country.
- What Are You Going To Do With That
The question my title poses, of course, is the one that is classically aimed at humanities majors. What practical value could there possibly be in studying literature or art or philosophy? So you must be wondering why I’m bothering to raise it here, at Stanford, this renowned citadel of science and technology. What doubt can there be that the world will offer you many opportunities to use your degree?
But that’s not the question I’m asking. By “do” I don’t mean a job, and by “that” I don’t mean your major. We are more than our jobs, and education is more than a major. Education is more than college, more even than the totality of your formal schooling, from kindergarten through graduate school. By “What are you going to do,” I mean, what kind of life are you going to lead? And by “that,” I mean everything in your training, formal and informal, that has brought you to be sitting here today, and everything you’re going to be doing for the rest of the time that you’re in school.
We should start by talking about how you did, in fact, get here. You got here by getting very good at a certain set of skills. Your parents pushed you to excel from the time you were very young. They sent you to good schools, where the encouragement of your teachers and the example of your peers helped push you even harder. Your natural aptitudes were nurtured so that, in addition to excelling in all your subjects, you developed a number of specific interests that you cultivated with particular vigor. You did extracurricular activities, went to afterschool programs, took private lessons. You spent summers doing advanced courses at a local college or attending skill-specific camps and workshops. You worked hard, you paid attention, and you tried your very best. And so you got very good at math, or piano, or lacrosse, or, indeed, several things at once.
Now there’s nothing wrong with mastering skills, with wanting to do your best and to be the best. What’s wrong is what the system leaves out: which is to say, everything else. I don’t mean that by choosing to excel in math, say, you are failing to develop your verbal abilities to their fullest extent, or that in addition to focusing on geology, you should also focus on political science, or that while you’re learning the piano, you should also be working on the flute. It is the nature of specialization, after all, to be specialized. No, the problem with specialization is that it narrows your attention to the point where all you know about and all you want to know about, and, indeed, all you can know about, is your specialty.
The problem with specialization is that it makes you into a specialist. It cuts you off, not only from everything else in the world, but also from everything else in yourself. And of course, as college freshmen, your specialization is only just beginning. In the journey toward the success that you all hope to achieve, you have completed, by getting into Stanford, only the first of many legs. Three more years of college, three or four or five years of law school or medical school or a Ph.D. program, then residencies or postdocs or years as a junior associate. In short, an ever-narrowing funnel of specialization. You go from being a political-science major to being a lawyer to being a corporate attorney to being a corporate attorney focusing on taxation issues in the consumer-products industry. You go from being a biochemistry major to being a doctor to being a cardiologist to being a cardiac surgeon who performs heart-valve replacements.
Again, there’s nothing wrong with being those things. It’s just that, as you get deeper and deeper into the funnel, into the tunnel, it becomes increasingly difficult to remember who you once were. You start to wonder what happened to that person who played piano and lacrosse and sat around with her friends having intense conversations about life and politics and all the things she was learning in her classes. The 19-year-old who could do so many things, and was interested in so many things, has become a 40-year-old who thinks about only one thing. That’s why older people are so boring. “Hey, my dad’s a smart guy, but all he talks about is money and livers.”
And there’s another problem. Maybe you never really wanted to be a cardiac surgeon in the first place. It just kind of happened. It’s easy, the way the system works, to simply go with the flow. I don’t mean the work is easy, but the choices are easy. Or rather, the choices sort of make themselves. You go to a place like Stanford because that’s what smart kids do. You go to medical school because it’s prestigious. You specialize in cardiology because it’s lucrative. You do the things that reap the rewards, that make your parents proud, and your teachers pleased, and your friends impressed. From the time you started high school and maybe even junior high, your whole goal was to get into the best college you could, and so now you naturally think about your life in terms of “getting into” whatever’s next. “Getting into” is validation; “getting into” is victory. Stanford, then Johns Hopkins medical school, then a residency at the University of San Francisco, and so forth. Or Michigan Law School, or Goldman Sachs, or McKinsey, or whatever. You take it one step at a time, and the next step always seems to be inevitable.
Or maybe you did always want to be a cardiac surgeon. You dreamed about it from the time you were 10 years old, even though you had no idea what it really meant, and you stayed on course for the entire time you were in school. You refused to be enticed from your path by that great experience you had in AP history, or that trip you took to Costa Rica the summer after your junior year in college, or that terrific feeling you got taking care of kids when you did your rotation in pediatrics during your fourth year in medical school.
But either way, either because you went with the flow or because you set your course very early, you wake up one day, maybe 20 years later, and you wonder what happened: how you got there, what it all means. Not what it means in the “big picture,” whatever that is, but what it means to you. Why you’re doing it, what it’s all for. It sounds like a cliché, this “waking up one day,” but it’s called having a midlife crisis, and it happens to people all the time.
There is an alternative, however, and it may be one that hasn’t occurred to you. Let me try to explain it by telling you a story about one of your peers, and the alternative that hadn’t occurred to her. A couple of years ago, I participated in a panel discussion at Harvard that dealt with some of these same matters, and afterward I was contacted by one of the students who had come to the event, a young woman who was writing her senior thesis about Harvard itself, how it instills in its students what she called self-efficacy, the sense that you can do anything you want. Self-efficacy, or, in more familiar terms, self-esteem. There are some kids, she said, who get an A on a test and say, “I got it because it was easy.” And there are other kids, the kind with self-efficacy or self-esteem, who get an A on a test and say, “I got it because I’m smart.”
Again, there’s nothing wrong with thinking that you got an A because you’re smart. But what that Harvard student didn’t realize—and it was really quite a shock to her when I suggested it—is that there is a third alternative. True self-esteem, I proposed, means not caring whether you get an A in the first place. True self-esteem means recognizing, despite everything that your upbringing has trained you to believe about yourself, that the grades you get—and the awards, and the test scores, and the trophies, and the acceptance letters—are not what defines who you are.
She also claimed, this young woman, that Harvard students take their sense of self-efficacy out into the world and become, as she put it, “innovative.” But when I asked her what she meant by innovative, the only example she could come up with was “being CEO of a Fortune 500.” That’s not innovative, I told her, that’s just successful, and successful according to a very narrow definition of success. True innovation means using your imagination, exercising the capacity to envision new possibilities.
But I’m not here to talk about technological innovation, I’m here to talk about a different kind. It’s not about inventing a new machine or a new drug. It’s about inventing your own life. Not following a path, but making your own path. The kind of imagination I’m talking about is moral imagination. “Moral” meaning not right or wrong, but having to do with making choices. Moral imagination means the capacity to envision new ways to live your life.
It means not just going with the flow. It means not just “getting into” whatever school or program comes next. It means figuring out what you want for yourself, not what your parents want, or your peers want, or your school wants, or your society wants. Originating your own values. Thinking your way toward your own definition of success. Not simply accepting the life that you’ve been handed. Not simply accepting the choices you’ve been handed. When you walk into Starbucks, you’re offered a choice among a latte and a macchiato and an espresso and a few other things, but you can also make another choice. You can turn around and walk out. When you walk into college, you are offered a choice among law and medicine and investment banking and consulting and a few other things, but again, you can also do something else, something that no one has thought of before.
Let me give you another counterexample. I wrote an essay a couple of years ago that touched on some of these same points. I said, among other things, that kids at places like Yale or Stanford tend to play it safe and go for the conventional rewards. And one of the most common criticisms I got went like this: What about Teach for America? Lots of kids from elite colleges go and do TFA after they graduate, so therefore I was wrong. TFA, TFA—I heard that over and over again. And Teach for America is undoubtedly a very good thing. But to cite TFA in response to my argument is precisely to miss the point, and to miss it in a way that actually confirms what I’m saying. The problem with TFA—or rather, the problem with the way that TFA has become incorporated into the system—is that it’s just become another thing to get into.
In terms of its content, Teach for America is completely different from Goldman Sachs or McKinsey or Harvard Medical School or Berkeley Law, but in terms of its place within the structure of elite expectations, of elite choices, it is exactly the same. It’s prestigious, it’s hard to get into, it’s something that you and your parents can brag about, it looks good on your résumé, and most important, it represents a clearly marked path. You don’t have to make it up yourself, you don’t have to do anything but apply and do the work—just like college or law school or McKinsey or whatever. It’s the Stanford or Harvard of social engagement. It’s another hurdle, another badge. It requires aptitude and diligence, but it does not require a single ounce of moral imagination.
Moral imagination is hard, and it’s hard in a completely different way than the hard things you’re used to doing. And not only that, it’s not enough. If you’re going to invent your own life, if you’re going to be truly autonomous, you also need courage: moral courage. The courage to act on your values in the face of what everyone’s going to say and do to try to make you change your mind. Because they’re not going to like it. Morally courageous individuals tend to make the people around them very uncomfortable. They don’t fit in with everybody else’s ideas about the way the world is supposed to work, and still worse, they make them feel insecure about the choices that they themselves have made—or failed to make. People don’t mind being in prison as long as no one else is free. But stage a jailbreak, and everybody else freaks out.
In A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, James Joyce has Stephen Dedalus famously say, about growing up in Ireland in the late 19th century, “When the soul of a man is born in this country there are nets flung at it to hold it back from flight. You talk to me of nationality, language, religion. I shall try to fly by those nets.”
Today there are other nets. One of those nets is a term that I’ve heard again and again as I’ve talked with students about these things. That term is “self-indulgent.” “Isn’t it self-indulgent to try to live the life of the mind when there are so many other things I could be doing with my degree?” “Wouldn’t it be self-indulgent to pursue painting after I graduate instead of getting a real job?”
These are the kinds of questions that young people find themselves being asked today if they even think about doing something a little bit different. Even worse, the kinds of questions they are made to feel compelled to ask themselves. Many students have spoken to me, as they navigated their senior years, about the pressure they felt from their peers—from their peers—to justify a creative or intellectual life. You’re made to feel like you’re crazy: crazy to forsake the sure thing, crazy to think it could work, crazy to imagine that you even have a right to try.
Think of what we’ve come to. It is one of the great testaments to the intellectual—and moral, and spiritual—poverty of American society that it makes its most intelligent young people feel like they’re being self-indulgent if they pursue their curiosity. You are all told that you’re supposed to go to college, but you’re also told that you’re being “self-indulgent” if you actually want to get an education. Or even worse, give yourself one. As opposed to what? Going into consulting isn’t self-indulgent? Going into finance isn’t self-indulgent? Going into law, like most of the people who do, in order to make yourself rich, isn’t self-indulgent? It’s not OK to play music, or write essays, because what good does that really do anyone, but it is OK to work for a hedge fund. It’s selfish to pursue your passion, unless it’s also going to make you a lot of money, in which case it’s not selfish at all.
Do you see how absurd this is? But these are the nets that are flung at you, and this is what I mean by the need for courage. And it’s a never-ending process. At that Harvard event two years ago, one person said, about my assertion that college students needed to keep rethinking the decisions they’ve made about their lives, “We already made our decisions, back in middle school, when we decided to be the kind of high achievers who get into Harvard.” And I thought, who wants to live with the decisions that they made when they were 12? Let me put that another way. Who wants to let a 12-year-old decide what they’re going to do for the rest of their lives? Or a 19-year-old, for that matter?
All you can decide is what you think now, and you need to be prepared to keep making revisions. Because let me be clear. I’m not trying to persuade you all to become writers or musicians. Being a doctor or a lawyer, a scientist or an engineer or an economist—these are all valid and admirable choices. All I’m saying is that you need to think about it, and think about it hard. All I’m asking is that you make your choices for the right reasons. All I’m urging is that you recognize and embrace your moral freedom.
And most of all, don’t play it safe. Resist the seductions of the cowardly values our society has come to prize so highly: comfort, convenience, security, predictability, control. These, too, are nets. Above all, resist the fear of failure. Yes, you will make mistakes. But they will be your mistakes, not someone else’s. And you will survive them, and you will know yourself better for having made them, and you will be a fuller and a stronger person.
It’s been said—and I’m not sure I agree with this, but it’s an idea that’s worth taking seriously—that you guys belong to a “postemotional” generation. That you prefer to avoid messy and turbulent and powerful feelings. But I say, don’t shy away from the challenging parts of yourself. Don’t deny the desires and curiosities, the doubts and dissatisfactions, the joy and the darkness, that might knock you off the path that you have set for yourself. College is just beginning for you, adulthood is just beginning. Open yourself to the possibilities they represent. The world is much larger than you can imagine right now. Which means, you are much larger than you can imagine.
Jesus calls us to something more. Rev. Michael Calabria, O.F.M., once likened living out God’s law to learning to dance. The law is like the basic steps and rhythms we must practice. Building blocks are necessary. But if we don’t finally become filled with the music, become one with our feet and our dance partner, we will never truly dance. We must strive to live out God’s law; but if we never move beyond the law into the spirit, we fail to be free.
Chloe Benson from Georgetown Lent devotionals<p>People of Groupon,</p> <p>After four and a half intense and wonderful years as CEO of Groupon, I’ve decided that I’d like to spend more time with my family. Just kidding - I was fired today. If you’re wondering why… you haven’t been paying attention. From controversial metrics in our S1 to our material weakness to two quarters of missing our own expectations and a stock price that’s hovering around one quarter of our listing price, the events of the last year and a half speak for themselves. As CEO, I am accountable.</p> <p>You are doing amazing things at Groupon, and you deserve the outside world to give you a second chance. I’m getting in the way of that. A fresh CEO earns you that chance. The board is aligned behind the strategy we’ve shared over the last few months, and I’ve never seen you working together more effectively as a global company - it’s time to give Groupon a relief valve from the public noise.</p> <p>For those who are concerned about me, please don’t be - I love Groupon, and I’m terribly proud of what we’ve created. I’m OK with having failed at this part of the journey. If Groupon was Battletoads, it would be like I made it all the way to the Terra Tubes without dying on my first ever play through. I am so lucky to have had the opportunity to take the company this far with all of you. I’ll now take some time to decompress (FYI I’m looking for a good fat camp to lose my Groupon 40, if anyone has a suggestion), and then maybe I’ll figure out how to channel this experience into something productive.</p> <p>If there’s one piece of wisdom that this simple pilgrim would like to impart upon you: have the courage to start with the customer. My biggest regrets are the moments that I let a lack of data override my intuition on what’s best for our customers. This leadership change gives you some breathing room to break bad habits and deliver sustainable customer happiness - don’t waste the opportunity!</p> <p>I will miss you terribly.</p> <p>Love,</p> <p>Andrew</p>
Groupon CEO Andrew MasonThe people who seek protection from the necessity of taking a stand, by refusing to admit to themselves the nature of that which they are accepting; the people who support plans specifically designed to achieve serfdom, but hide behind the empty assertion that they are lovers of freedom, with no concrete meaning attached to the word; the people who believe that the content of ideas need not be examined, that principles need not be defined, and that facts can be eliminated by keeping one’s eyes shut. They expect, when they find themselves in a world of bloody ruins and concentration camps, to escape moral responsibility by wailing: “But I didn’t mean this!
Ayn Rand
- 9 plays
- 59 plays
- 20 plays
- 60 plays
-
Checkins
- Wahaca19-23 Charlotte St.
- Charlotte Street Hotel15-17 Charlotte St.
- Le NemoursPlace Colette
- Octane Coffee1009 Marietta St NW
- YEAH! Burger1168 Howell Mill Rd NW
- OK Cafe1284 W Paces Ferry Rd NW
- Grindhouse Killer Burgers1842 Piedmont Ave NE
- YEAH! Burger1168 Howell Mill Rd NW
- Houston's3539 Northside Pkwy NW
- Octane Coffee1009 Marietta St NW
- Octane Coffee1009 Marietta St NW
- Taqueria Del Sol334 Prince Ave
- Osteria del Figo1210 Howell Mill Rd NW
- Octane Coffee1009 Marietta St NW
- Salt Life Food Shack1018 3rd St N
- Palm Valley Fish Camp299 N Roscoe Blvd
- Octane Coffee1009 Marietta St NW
- YEAH! Burger1168 Howell Mill Rd NW
- Bocado887 Howell Mill Rd NW
- Jalisco Mexican Restaurant2337 Peachtree Rd NE
-
Info
- Summary
John Riley is an eighteen year old high school senior. His best strength lies in using technology as a catalyst for efficient execution of ideas.
John started his own IT company at the age of ten. As a rising freshman in high school, he joined Ripple IT and was exposed to fast moving, creative companies. With his experience there, he converted his own company to a managed services model, and has worked for several companies since.
John has a high GPA at North Atlanta High School in the competitive International Baccalaureate program, volunteers regularly at Buckhead Church, and is an Eagle Scout.
Experience- Jun 2011 - PresentBusiness Analyst / RevealVentures
At RevealVentures, John assists with all aspects of launching and maintaining web-based ventures. Using data from Google-based SEO tools, John researches and analyzes the feasibility and profitability of ventures. During launch, John aids in the creation of relevant content for consumers. Technical tools such as WordPress, MailChimp, Amazon Web Services, and SendGrid are vital to the success of the sites.
» Actively determines viability of ventures by researching market size and competition
» Assembles and delivers necessary information to decision makers on time
» Works extensively with content management platforms, MailChimp email marketing, & SEO/Analytics tools
» Builds out sites, actively created content in order to launch on-time
» Tracks visitors, identifying and eliminating problems as needed and reported by data - Feb 2004 - PresentFounder / John Riley IT
John Riley IT provides user-friendly, proactive IT services to small businesses and families in Atlanta, GA. Started by John at the age of ten, the company was converted from a traditional hourly model to a proactive, monthly services model in 2009, and now provides proactive TotalSupport, CrashPlan Hosted Backup, and Exchange Hosted E-Mail to over twenty clients.
» Started company at age of ten
» Grew under hourly model to over sixty clients
» In 2009, converted to managed services model
» Provides TotalSupport, CrashPlan, and Hosted Exchange services to over 20 clients
» Proactively ensures great customer service experience - Oct 2011 - Jan 2012Social Media Consultant / Poll Position
Poll Position is a public opinion site where users can vote and speak out on hot topics in American society. Founded by former CNN Executive Eason Jordan, John was charged with continuing user engagement with the brand through social media. He created and maintained Facebook, Twitter, and Tumblr pages, and drove relevant users to the site.
» Developed social media policy that was effective for style of brand and budget
» Created pages and content
» Drove new users to site, and guided returning users to new content
» Researched most effective wording, and tracked user engagement
» Advised CEO and editorial team on ways to attract wider audiences - Jun 2009 - Sept 2009Rippler / Ripple IT
Ripple provides managed IT services to creative companies. As a rising freshman in high school, John joined Ripple, supporting the existing team with knowledge he gained from his own company. Assisting clients on day one, John earned extremely high satisfaction from the clients (9.9 out of 10), and assisted in various dimensions with sales, support, and infrastructure projects.
» Worked with support team to close tickets and support customer base
» Assisted project managers with projects, including initial quotes, procurement, and support
» Worked alongside CEO and sales team to help with sales processes
» Assisted office manager as needed to improve workflow, specifically with telephony
» Helped improve and eliminate inefficient processes, in order to drive profitability
Education-
2010 - 2013North Atlanta High School
-
2006 - 2010The Westminster Schools
Additional Information-
Websites:
-
Honors:Eagle Scout, 2012
-
Interests:Business, minimalism, culture, refinement, nature
